IEA-PVPS Task 12
PV Environmental Health And Safety

Carbon Footprint of rooftop PV Systems - technology comparison

Carbon Footprint of rooftop PV systems from different technologies in southern Europe (optimal inclination & irradiation of 1700 kWh/m2/yr).
Source: de Wild-Scholten (ECN), Sustainability: Keeping the Thin Film Industry green, 2nd EPIA International Thin Film Conference, Munich, 2009).

Carbon Footprint of PV systems compared with different electriciy sources

Carbon Footprint of different electricity sources.
Specification: PV (CdTe/1700 kWh/m2 & optimally inclination)
Source: de Wild-Scholten (ECN), Sustainability: Keeping the Thin Film Industry green, 2nd EPIA International Thin Film Conference, Munich, 2009).

Life-cycle emissions from silicon and CdTe PV modules

Life-cycle emissions from silicon and CdTe PV modules. BOS is the Balance of System (i.e., module supports, cabling and power conditioning).
Specification: Ground-mounted systems, Southern European insolation, 1,700 kWh/m2/yr, performance ratio of 0.8, and lifetime of 30 years.  Case 1- current electricity mixture in Si production-CrystalClear project and Ecoinvent database. Case 2- UCTE grid mixture and Ecoinvent database. Case 3- US grid mixture and Franklin database
Source: Fthenakis, Kim and Alsema, Emissions from Photovoltaic Life Cycles, Environmental Science and Technology, 42(6):2168–2174).

Preliminary projections of Global Warming Potential (GWP) for selected PV technologies in the years 2025 and 2050. Assumed efficiency and lifetimes are: sc-Si today 14%/30 years; ribbon-Si 2025 20%/35years; CdTe 2025 13%/35years; ribbon-Si 2025 22%/40years; CdTe 2050 16%/40years and DCS 2050 17%/15years. Source: M. Raugei and P. Frankl, Life cycle impacts and costs of photovoltaic systems: current state of the art and future outlooks, Energy 34 (2009), 392-399.

 

 

back to index (overview of LCA facts and figures)